- Access to Justice?
- Infrasound and other things that go bump in the night
- Wake in Fright: Wind Turbine Infrasound Causes Panic, Fear & Nightmares
- Windfarms affect children
- Hateful Eight: 8 Solid Reasons Why Subsidised Wind Power is Both Pointless & Harmful to Health & Wealth
- Debunking the 100% Renewables Fantasy: Running on Sunshine & Breezes – Pure Nonsense
- Bring on the Super Sub!
- Wind Turbine Noise & Vibration Causing Harm to Humans & Animals Alike
Access to Justice? |… on Access to Justice? Neil van Dokkum on Access to Justice? Beth Harrington on Access to Justice? Neil van Dokkum on Wake in Fright: Wind Turbine I… Emyr Griffiths on Wake in Fright: Wind Turbine I… Infrasound and other… on Infrasound and other things th… Neil van Dokkum on Important ECJ Ruling on the SE… Pieter Vandenheede on Important ECJ Ruling on the SE… Pat Swords on Bring on the Super Sub! Wind Turbine Noise |… on Wind Turbine Noise
- Follow The Law is my Oyster on WordPress.com
Category Archives: Pat Swords
The Aarhus Compliance Committee has interpreted Article 9 (3) of the Convention to mean that the public must have access to adequate judicial mechanisms in the event of acts and omissions in contravention of environmental law and, secondly, to provide … Continue reading
The first session involved the opening statements. These are delivered in writing to the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (ACCC) beforehand, which allows a speaker from both sides to paraphrase and highlight the main points underpinning the Communication and the … Continue reading
The Captain’s warm-up had gone well and so we arrived at the beautiful but enormous Palace of Nations in Geneva with the usual pre-match jitters, but with Pat Swords charging ahead and us in his wake, we found our … Continue reading
Readers were enraged at the contents of a previous blog on the inexplicable lack of activity on the part of the High Court in the case of Swords v Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources. Conspiracy theories came thick … Continue reading
How often do you hear a politician and/or guilty party (when these are distinguishable) answer a penetrating question with: “I’m sorry, that matter is sub judice, I am not allowed to comment”? What they are saying is that as the matter … Continue reading