Neil van Dokkum on Reasons, and the reasons for g… Kate Tolan on Reasons, and the reasons for g… andreasmarciniak on Plain English please! Neil van Dokkum on Plain English please! Pat Sharkey on Plain English please! Neil van Dokkum on Hate Speech Nigel de Haas on Hate Speech Mrs Daryl-Ann Fleetw… on Hate Speech Neil van Dokkum on How do our courts work? Colin Mc Donnell on How do our courts work?
- Follow The Law is my Oyster on WordPress.com
Category Archives: Pat Swords
The Aarhus Compliance Committee has interpreted Article 9 (3) of the Convention to mean that the public must have access to adequate judicial mechanisms in the event of acts and omissions in contravention of environmental law and, secondly, to provide … Continue reading
The first session involved the opening statements. These are delivered in writing to the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (ACCC) beforehand, which allows a speaker from both sides to paraphrase and highlight the main points underpinning the Communication and the … Continue reading
The Captain’s warm-up had gone well and so we arrived at the beautiful but enormous Palace of Nations in Geneva with the usual pre-match jitters, but with Pat Swords charging ahead and us in his wake, we found our … Continue reading
Readers were enraged at the contents of a previous blog on the inexplicable lack of activity on the part of the High Court in the case of Swords v Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources. Conspiracy theories came thick … Continue reading
How often do you hear a politician and/or guilty party (when these are distinguishable) answer a penetrating question with: “I’m sorry, that matter is sub judice, I am not allowed to comment”? What they are saying is that as the matter … Continue reading