Cans can bounce (back)

6a0133f440106f970b01543247eaef970c

There have been a number of interesting comments on Nigel’s blog of last week, “Kicking Cans”. One of those was a link to a German article by a medical doctor on important new research regarding the dangers of infrasound emitted by wind turbines. The ever tenacious Nigel de Haas has again offered his literary and editing skills by providing a readable translation of this article, which I reproduce here (the highlights and spacing are mine):

 

DR. MED. THOMAS CARL STILLER

March 27, 2017

Infrasound – the boomerang of energy sources

Dr. Thomas Carl Stiller is a specialist physician of general medicine and co-founder of “Doctors for Emission Control” (AEFIS).

 

People living in proximity to wind power plants often describe their complaints concerning low-frequency noise (infrasound) from these plants as “I feel what you cannot hear.”

But what is the cause of infrasound, what impact does it have on people, what standards regulate the permissible sound emissions and what is the state of science on these issues?

Inaudible but biophysiologically effective sound is not science fiction but an increasing threat to health.

First, a few physical bases: sound is the pressure change in a medium such as air and spreads around the source. The lower the frequency, the more sound is transported in the air. Very low frequencies are also transmitted through closed buildings. As a result of acoustic reflections and superimpositions, it can then lead to excessively high sound pressure values. In general, sounds and noises are described by frequency, timbre and volume. The human ear can hear frequencies approximately in the range of 20,000 Hz, i.e., vibrations per second (high tones) to 20 Hz (low tones). The sound range above a frequency of 20,000 Hz is referred to as ultrasound, below 200 Hz as low-frequency sound, below 20 Hz as ultrasound. Both infrasound and ultrasound are no longer perceived by the ear, but the body has a subtle perception for infrasound, and some people are particularly sensitive to low-frequency sound. In nature, low-frequency vibrations are ubiquitous. For example, some migratory birds orient themselves by the noise of the sea which is transmitted over several hundred kilometres in the atmosphere.

The infrasound from wind turbines is still measurable for several kilometres1.

On the other hand, humans are often exposed to technically generated ultrasound in their immediate surroundings. In residential areas, in the age of energy efficiency regulations for new buildings, air heat pumps are increasingly used as energy sources, which are cheaper to purchase than many other heating systems. In operation, however, they are often annoying for the neighbours, if the compressors are too loud and run too long. Even more problematic are wind power plants, in particular the modern large plants, which are mostly placed in front of villages and settlements at a small distance from the housing development. A pressure wave is generated every time a rotor blade is passed in front of the tower; many people perceive this as periodic “thumping”, sometimes also at a distance of several kilometres. The consequences of technically generated infrasound are only gradually becoming understood. About 10 – 30 percent of the population is sensitive to infrasound radiation. These people, which in Germany number several million, develop numerous symptoms, which are now understood by more and more physicians. The lowfrequency oscillations from compressors and wind power plants cause stress reactions in these people, which manifest themselves in sleep disorders, concentration disorders, nausea, tinnitus, dysphasia, dizziness, cardiac arrhythmia, fatigue, depression and anxiety disorders, earaches and permanent hearing impairments.

From a physiological point of view, there is damage to the hair cells of the cortical organ of the auditory canal and to permanent irritation in cerebral arteries, such as the amygdala (anxiety centre)2.

Effects on the heart and blood vessels included diseased changes of the connective tissue in the arteries of the pericardium (heart bag) detected in experiments3 with animals which were exposed to infrasound for a long duration. Those affected cannot escape the effects of health and harassment. They are often ineffective for a long period of time. A neurobiological habituation of sensitive persons on technical infrasound is not known. It is often falsely asserted that the symptoms are attributable to the attitude of persons concerned about the sources of the infrasound. Unfortunately, this is not observed in medical practice; the symptoms are all sensitive.

Numerous international studies have been carried out over the last few years, but in Germany this research is not advanced and almost unknown at the political level. If the symptoms occur, however, those affected are often hardly in a position to react. Those who live in a residential area affected by low-frequency noise and infrasound radiation cannot usually move away if, for example, they have to sell their house, which has lost a lot of value due to nearby wind power plants.

Who can perform optimally in today’s working world if sleep deprived and unable to find peace and quiet in their home by pervasive infrasound loading4.

How long can those affected compensate for this healthily and financially? Infrasound-sensitive people are ensnared in a tragic dilemma: their complaints are not taken seriously and legally they do not go further because of the lack of emission control regulations.

The acoustician Steven Cooper, together with a wind farm operator in Australia, investigated the effects of infrasound on the local population. Local residents in the vicinity of a nearby wind park complained about the above symptoms. But they did not have the wind farm directly in front of them. Cooper had their symptoms recorded at an exact time and checked the correlation with the activity of the wind power plants; the symptoms were strongest when the wind power plants were particularly active5.

In Denmark, information on malformed foetuses and miscarriages on a mink farm where wind turbine installations were subsequently built, as well as frequent reports of disease symptoms of people near wind power plants, led to a moratorium on wind energy expansion, pending completion of investigation of the connections.

The subject of infrasound radiation has also been taken seriously for some time6.  All previously valid protection standards, such as the Technische Anleitung (TA) noise and the DIN 45680, are based on the assumption that only sound which can be perceived by the ear can be damaged7. Other forms of the perception of sound are excluded. The measurement regulations are also not helpful, since only sound above 8 Hz is measured, although modern instruments can also detect frequencies of <1 Hz and the infrasound range in the range 1 – 8 Hz causes particularly severe health impairments.

The prescribed sound measurements also average individual frequency peaks. They are based on the decibel A filter, which follows the human auditory curve in the audible sound range and measures on many different frequencies rather than linearly and narrowly, as would be appropriate to avoid health hazards in the infrasound range.

Furthermore, often obsolete measuring systems and microphones that do not measure accurately enough in the infrasonic range are still permitted within the scope of the currently valid regulations for measurement. As a result, the measurement of the sound phenomena that are harmful to human beings does not take place below 20 Hz. Since these measurement regulations are the basis for approval procedures for technical systems, they must be adapted to the current state of the art. There would be a direct effect if the standards and regulations for the approval procedures of technical installations were at the level of the international state of knowledge. Were the standards for sound pressure to correspond to the state of the art, the limits for infrasound pressure would be set lower, the models for the propagation of infrasound would correspond to the state of research and the construction of plants would be optimized in terms of emissions of low-frequency sound. If technical sources of infrasound radiation are not removed quickly and sustainably enough by wind turbines, public complaints will develop into a health boomerang with respect to energy sources.

A new national disease on a par with diabetes and cancer is now inevitable given the failure of governments to act. It is high time for politically responsible people to meet their protection obligation for humans and nature and to initiate the most important measures from the point of view of preventive medicine an immediate dismantling of wind power, greater minimum distances between humans and wind power plants, prioritise objective infrasound research coupled with modern measurement regulations in the corresponding DIN standards and stricter protective regulations directed at sound physics and biology.

 

Footnotes

1 Lars Ceranna, Gernot Hartmann & Manfred Henger; “The inaudible sound of wind turbines – infrasound measurements on a wind turbine north of Hanover, Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), Unit B3.11, Seismology, 2004

2 AN Salt, JT Lichtenhan; “Perception-based protection from low-frequency sound may not be enough”; InterNoise 2012. http://oto2.wustl.edu/cochlea . AN Salt, JT Lichtenhan; “How does wind turbine noise affect people?”, 2014.

3 Alves-Pereira M, Castelo Branco NA; Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2007 Jan-Apr 93 (1-3): 256-79. Epub 2006 Aug 4; “Vibroacoustic disease: biological effects of infrasound and low-frequency noise elucidated by mechanotransduction cellular signaling”.

4 Claire Paller (2014). “Exploring the Association between Proximity to Industrial Wind Turbines and Self-Reported Health Outcomes in Ontario, Canada”; UWSpace, http://hdl.handle.net/10012/8268.

5 Steven Cooper; “Cape Bridgewater Wind Farm”; 44.5100.R7: MSC; Prepared for: Energy Pacific (Vic) Pty Ltd, Level 11, 474 Flinders Street, Melbourne VIC 3000, Date: 26th Nov, 2014.

6 Robert Koch Institute; “Infrasonic and low-frequency sound – a topic for environmental health protection in Germany?”, Communication from the Commission “Methods and quality assurance in environmental medicine”. Position paper of the doctors for emission control (www.aefis.de).

7 Standards: DIN 45680, 45401, 45651; Technical guidance noise (TA noise). “Acoustics – Attenuation of sound in outdoor propagation – Part 2: General calculation method”. DIN EN 61260: 2003-03; “Electroacoustics – Band filters for octaves and fractions of octaves”; DIN EN 61400-11; “Wind energy installations, Part 11: Sound-measurement methods, acoustics, electroacoustics”; “Standard frequencies for measurements” (retracted), “Octave filters for electroacoustic measurements” (withdrawn

About Neil van Dokkum

Neil van Dokkum (B. SocSc; LLB; LLM; PGC Con.Lit) Neil is a law lecturer and has been so since arriving in Ireland from South Africa in 2002. Prior to that Neil worked in a leading firm of solicitors from 1987-1992, before being admitted as an Advocate of the Supreme Court of South Africa (a barrister) in 1992. He published three books in South Africa on employment law and unfair dismissal, as well as being published in numerous national and international peer-reviewed journals. Neil currently specialises in employment law, medical negligence law, family law and child protection law. He dabbles in EU law (procurement and energy). Neil retired from practice in 2002 to take up a full-time lecturing post. He has published three books since then, “Nursing Law for Irish Students (2005); “Evidence” (2007); and “Nursing Law for Students in Ireland” (2011). He is an accredited and practising mediator and is busy writing a book, with Dr Sinead Conneely, on Mediation in Ireland. His current interest is Ireland’s energy policy and its impact on the people and the environment. He is also researching the area of disability as a politico-economic construct. Neil is very happily married to Fiona, and they have two sons, Rory and Ian.
This entry was posted in Democracy; Ireland; Fine Gael; Labour; Sinn Fein; Workers; Constitution, Dr Sarah Laurie; Steve Cooper; Bob McMurtry; Alun Evans, EU Renewable Energy 2020 Target, Planning and Development Act 2000; guidelines; directives; Sections 28 & 29, The Spokes of the Wheel; wind farms; Ireland; Windfall, Wind Farm Contract, Wind Farm Guidelines, turbines, flicker, noise, distance, Denis Naughten, Wind Turbine Syndrome; Professor Alun Evans and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Cans can bounce (back)

  1. It would be interesting to know if there is still a moritorium in place in Denmark? The Green party, FOE et al portray Denmark as the benchmark that we should aspire to, yet I have yet to hear any calls from that quarter for investigations into the negative health effects of infrasound / noise. Does anybody know the current status of Denmarks onshore wind programme?

  2. Pat Swords says:

    Dave

    It’s a bit like what Margret Thatcher said about socialism – “you run out of other people’s money to spend”. The price of electricity in Denmark is astronomical, at 30 cent per kWh. Effectively it has reached the situation, where you would be financially better off, if you had your own generator in the garage. So they are running out of the ability to throw any more subsidies at the scam. You can read between the lines from the industry mags themselves:

    http://www.offshorewind.biz/2017/01/25/report-denmark-mulling-offshore-wind-subsidies-cut/

    By the way Nigel wasn’t clear enough in relation to the article above, it was published by the Deutscher Arbeitgeber Verband, the German employer’s association, their equivalent of IBEC.

    https://www.deutscherarbeitgeberverband.de/

    Their website is also flashing up that on the 11th April there is an event:

    Mythen in der Engergiepolitik – Warum wir einen Neustart in der Energiepolitik brauchen
    Myths in the energy policy – why we need a new start in the energy policy

    There is also flashing up an article “Die Energie Frage”, which is quite rightly pointing out, that not only are low levels of radioactivity not a damaging issue, but actually have a positive effect. Again what we are dealing with is not rational responses, but hysteria fueled all too often by those who have their own agenda. But don’t get me started on this, as after seven months in the Ukraine and several visits to Belarus, I’m all too aware that the aircrews, who fly in these so called ‘Chernobyl Children’ get far more radiation than those children ever did, who are pawns in a political agenda and charity business. There are sick children everywhere, it’s unfortunately part of nature and I have nothing against them getting a holiday abroad, but I do absolutely and utterly detest the lies and deceit which are integral to this ‘Chernobyl Children’ agenda.

    However, but by bit truth slowly gets its boots on and people begin to question and evaluate.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/chernobyl-hints-radiation-may-be-less-dangerous-than-thought-a-1088744.html

    Germany is facing an important political year, not only are their Federal elections due in September, but there are also regional elections in some of the 16 provinces (Lander). If you care to evaluate the performance of the once kingpin German Greens, they have being increasingly under performing over the last five years. In the elections in the Province of Saarland on the 24th March they failed to meet the 5% hurdle and fell out of the parliament there, although the new kids on the block, the AfD, the new right wing party made it in easily. In May there are two more regional elections scheduled, the one to watch being Nord Rhein Westfalen, which contains Europe’s most densely populated conurbation around the Ruhr area (Dusseldorf, Essen, Dortmund, etc.) with over 16 million people. You can see from the most recent public opinion polls there below that the Greens (Grune) are struggling, while the AfD are gaining strength:

    http://www.wahlrecht.de/umfragen/landtage/nrw.htm

    So the political mood is bouncing back to what one would see as ‘old fashion’ rather than ‘trendy views’. Personally I couldn’t put it better myself than the AfD’s position on man made catastrophic climate change :

    The party’s position is on climate change is summed up in three sentences on its website: “Scientific research on the long-term development of the climate because of man-made CO2 emissions is fraught with uncertainty. On top of that, a global problem can be solved only by a coordinated initiative of all the big economic nations. For that reason, the AfD rejects all national and European unilateral action.”

    In other words, don’t go betting your house on wild speculation, as others are clearly not going to do so. Anyhow read between the lines below from the German State owned media experts, who hate them:

    http://www.dw.com/en/what-does-the-afd-stand-for/a-19100127

    So pendulums swing and a swing is starting to occur in Germany. How far it will swing only time will tend, but the days of unlimited sums of money being thrown at ‘trendy’ virtue signalling are coming to an end. This is because of many factors:

    Money simply doesn’t grown on trees and people are starting to question, as to where it is going and as to why:

    People are fed up of listening to the media’s exalted opinions instead of receiving factual analysis, etc.

    Indeed I personally love it when people talk about how they now prefer to read Waterford Whispers rather than the mainstream media, as they put it at least they know it is ‘fake news’ and after all isn’t it more entertaining than the other rubbish, which tries to convince us that it is not ‘fake news’ and instead something important!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s