The Public Meeting in Rainbow Hall


The turnout at last night’s meeting in Rainbow Hall was huge – well over five hundred people (and we have signed lists to prove that, RTE News). The meeting ended with a very resounding, and unanimous, rejection of the proposed plans of BSB Energy to build an industrial wind farm in Waterford’s World Heritage Site, the Copper Coast.

I am unused to speaking in front of such a huge crowd, so I was very nervous, and I fluffed my lines:  I forgot to introduce myself, I forgot to establish my qualifications and credentials, and I forgot to tell people that despite being a blow-in, I love my adopted country and my community with every fibre of my person. That last remark was meant to be aimed at a particular individual but it didn’t matter as he was too spineless to attend, despite being a major investor in the scheme. I noticed that he did send his lackey to take notes.

In my presentation I was deliberately talking to the investors (standing up all along the back wall) and people who were thinking of investing in BSB Energy. Anyway, just in case these people did not quite get my message, I will repeat the main points again:

A share is a device used by companies to generate funding. You hand them your money and in return you get a share certificate to the amount of your investment. As BSB are issuing shares valued at one euro each, the maths is easy: 100 euro gets you one hundred shares, ten thousand euros gets you ten thousand shares, and so on.

This is why the concept of “free shares” is a contradiction in terms. If shares are used by a company to produce income, why would a company hand out shares without getting money in return? The answer is obvious – the company never intends on paying out dividends on those shares (or it might pay out a few cents on the shares when the complaints start getting too loud – essentially paying a little money for lots of ‘good’ publicity). Unless you can sell them to some other unfortunate, those free shares are not worth the paper they’re printed on.

For those of you who have actually bought shares, the picture is not much rosier. As you have handed over money, you have now invested in the company’s fortunes. Unlike a public company on the stock exchange, where the share value might go up or down depending on the performance of the company, in a private company like BSB the share value is a constant – it keeps its ‘face value’. The only way the ordinary shareholder will make more money is where the company pays a dividend to shareholders, otherwise your investment remains static and in fact loses its value as you are not earning interest on that amount.

What a lot of people do not realise is that a company does not have to declare a dividend. There is no law that forces them to do so, and a shareholder is not entitled to go to court to force a company to declare a dividend. It is entirely a choice of the company if, and when, they declare a dividend, and for how much. A company might be making millions but they do not have to hand over a cent to the shareholders.

I am not making that up – the law is clear:

Usher, in Company Law in Ireland (1996, Sweet and Maxwell) states at p. 87:-

“… the general meeting (of shareholders) cannot force the directors to pay an interim dividend (article 117) or to recommend a final dividend (article 116) …”

The leading Irish case on this is Ryanair v. Aer Lingus [2011] IEHC 170, where the High Court made it clear that a company cannot be forced by its shareholders to pay a dividend:

“[17] The balance sheet which goes before an annual general meeting should contain the profit and loss account, a report by the directors and the auditor’s report. Section 158 of the Companies Act 1963 requires that the directors’ report must state the amount (if any) which they recommend should be paid by way of dividend. The directors’ report for the year ended the 31st December, 2010 states:-

“The directors do not propose the payment of dividends in respect of the year ended the 31st December, 2010.”

When these words are considered in the light of s. 158 of the Act of 1963, it seems clear to me that they are a recommendation by the board to the annual general meeting that no dividends be paid in respect of that year. A dividend does not become payable unless it is declared by one of the organs of the company. While the Companies Act 1963 does not specify which organ of the company should declare a dividend, it is usual for the articles of association to provide that it is to be declared by the company in a general meeting and it is not to exceed such amount as is recommended by the directors. That is precisely what is provided for in article 111 of the articles of association. I accept the submissions of the defendant that the directors have recommended to the members that no dividend be paid and that the first of the proposed resolutions by the plaintiff seeks to circumvent article 111. This is not permissible. The company was entitled to refuse to put this resolution before the annual general meeting since it was not within the power of the members by ordinary resolution to declare a dividend which exceeded the amount recommended by the directors. In this case, the directors were recommending no dividend.”

What this means is that you might have paid a lot of money to buy a lot of shares, but if the company does not declare a dividend, your investment does not increase in value. The only way you can make a profit then is to sell your shares to some other sucker for a profit. Good luck with that – to say that the community is hostile and angry is an understatement!

The proof of the pudding is the Templederry experience. Despite being launched seventeen years ago, the community has not seen a single return on their investment. This is despite the fact that Templederry Windfarm Limited declared a profit of over half a million euro at the end of the 2015 financial year. The community (“ordinary”) shareholders of the wind farm have not received a red cent.

This was confirmed by Paul Kenny of Tipperary Energy Agency, the advisors to both the Tipperary wind farm and the proposed BSB wind farm:

“As with all windfarms, the dividends to the shareholders (in Templederry’s case, individuals and the local community co-operative), is paid after a significant portion of the loans are repaid, which has not happened yet, neither the co-operative, directors or shareholders have received any dividend, but it will commence in due course.”

There is nothing illegal in this as the company does not have to declare a dividend. But that is cold comfort to the people who were hoping for a return on their investment, or the people who have to live next to these monsters, as we heard last night.

Similarly, there is nothing illegal in the fact that the directors of the Templederry Wind Farm paid themselves a salary every year (amounting in total to 27000 euro in 2014 and 28023 euro in 2015). They are entitled to do that, but again the legality of that is cold comfort to the investor who has received nothing for seventeen years.

The next step in the process for the communities opposing the proposed BSB wind farm is their consultation on Wednesday. Please attend that session and ask all the questions about anything you need to know, and record their answers for use in your submissions to the County Council, should the need arise.

Details of these questions and other information can be found on the Mahon Valley Against Turbines Facebook page.

Just to remind people what will happen to our community if this wind farm goes ahead, I received the following from Paddy Ryan, a resident in Templederry:

This ‘new’ idea of ‘Community Windfarms’ is a really bad one. I know people around Templederry who wanted to ‘invest’ in this but were kept out of the loop because some locals wanted it all for themselves, he’s really glad now as the local people are up in arms with those who fought to get these into the area. There’s no longer the community of neighbours left and children are being sent to ‘other’ schools so that they don’t have to interact with each other because of the decisions their parents made all those years ago.
The information about these Industrial Generators wasn’t as available back then as it is now and some people used to think it was a good idea, myself included, what could be better than availing of a natural resource but there’s nothing natural about these huge monstrosities on our landscape. They’re noisy, they’re killing off wild birds in their thousands, they’re causing low-land flooding with all the cement used in the upland hills, tearing through the land, removing the wild vegetation and forestry that used to soak up the rain.
My ESB bills have doubled in the last 10 years, and now companies see the subsidies drying up so they’re pawning them off as some sort of community advantage.
These people will stop at nothing to make money and they care not one bit for the communities who are left to try to live with the consequences of their actions.
The Copper Coast is one of the most outstanding areas of natural beauty in the South East of Ireland and is only becoming recognised by our tourists. I understand people in the area need to make a living and are inclined to take advantage of every opportunity but this isn’t an opportunity for local people, this is another scam from big business.
People need to be more aware of the consequences.”

About Neil van Dokkum

Neil van Dokkum (B. SocSc; LLB; LLM; PGC Con.Lit) Neil is a law lecturer and has been so since arriving in Ireland from South Africa in 2002. Prior to that Neil worked in a leading firm of solicitors from 1987-1992, before being admitted as an Advocate of the Supreme Court of South Africa (a barrister) in 1992. He published three books in South Africa on employment law and unfair dismissal, as well as being published in numerous national and international peer-reviewed journals. Neil currently specialises in employment law, medical negligence law, family law and child protection law. He dabbles in EU law (procurement and energy). Neil retired from full-time practice in 2002 to take up a lecturing post. He has published three books since then, “Nursing Law for Irish Students (2005); “Evidence” (2007); and “Nursing Law for Students in Ireland” (2011). His current interest is the area of disability as a politico-economic construct. Neil is very happily married to Fiona, and they have two sons, Rory and Ian.
This entry was posted in Academic Research; Peer-Review Process; Medical Journals, An Bord Pleanala; appeal; interested parties, Brexit, BSB Community Energy Ltd, Cloud; iCloud; Data Centre; Data Center, Democracy; Ireland; Fine Gael; Labour; Sinn Fein; Workers; Constitution, Dr Sarah Laurie; Steve Cooper; Bob McMurtry; Alun Evans, EIA Directive 2014/52/EU, EirGrid; Insurance; Law; Cancer; EMF, EU Renewable Energy 2020 Target, Framore Limited, Freedom of Information; Access to Environmental Information; AIE; Commissioner for Environmental Information, Green Party; Ireland; Eamonn Ryan; Cormac Manning, High Court; Judge Caroline Costello; John Callaghan; Leave to Appeal, High Court; Judicial Review; Appeal on the merits; judicial discretion, Irish Farmers Association; IFA; wind farm contracts, judicial review; Wednesbury Test; O'Keeffe; rationality; Separation of Powers, Justine McCarthy; The Sunday Times; EMF, Kilvinane Wind Farm Ltd; substituted consent, Law; High Court; Leave To Appeal; Environment, Legal Costs; Access to Justice; Courts, lobbying; democracy; political process; general election, Ministerial Responsibility; Liability; Negligence; cardiovascular, Ms Justice Costello; Section 37A Planning and Development Act 2000;, North-South Interconnector; An Bord Pleanala, NREAP; National Renewable Energy Action Plan; EU Commission; Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee; ACCC, Pat Swords, Paudie Coffey; series compensation; Fine Gael; Alan Kelly; Alex White, Peremptory law; Directory Law; Planning and Devlopment Act of 2000, Planning and Development Act 2000; guidelines; directives; Sections 28 & 29, Planning Permission; Extension; Planning and Development Act, Press Freedom, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters; Aarhus Convention; Aarhus Treaty, Refugees; Apartheid; Kulaks; Stalin;, Section 35; ESB Act 1927; wayleave notice, South Africa, wind turbines, developing nations,, Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA); Grid 25; North-South Interconnector, The Spokes of the Wheel; wind farms; Ireland; Windfall, Turkey; ABK Çeşme RES Enerji Elektrik Üretim A.Ş, University Hospital Waterford, Wind Farm Contract, Wind Farm Guidelines, turbines, flicker, noise, distance, Denis Naughten, Wind Turbine Syndrome; Professor Alun Evans. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The Public Meeting in Rainbow Hall

  1. Ronan Browne says:

    That’s excellent news indeed. Wonderful turnout! I wish the people of Connemara cared as much that they are in the process of being host to Irelands largest wind facility of nearly 200 turbines within a radius of a few miles.

    Please don’t forget everyone, that these meetings are not part of the planning process. What is aired at public meetings will not be taken into account in the (massively flawed) planning process. The only way to bring these points and knowledge to bear is to be sure to include them in your submissions. Only at that point will they become a part of the process.

    Best of luck tomorrow at the ‘consultation’.

    I’ll be up at the Wind Aware protest outside Leinster House tomorrow (Wednesday) from 12-2pm (I may even play a lament on the pipes) so please come up and say hello, anyone else who is representing their county.


  2. Neil van Dokkum says:

    Good man, Ronan. Best of luck with the protest. Wish I could be there, but we have a battle on our doorstep.

  3. J Murray says:

    What consultation meeting where and when? As far as I’m aware there has been no notification about it and I’m sure I’m not the only one who has’t heard about it!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s